Wintermute
Wintermute
BTC and the Nasdaq: the correlation that only hurts

BTC and the Nasdaq: the correlation that only hurts

BTC’s correlation with the Nasdaq remains high, however it trades with a bearish skew reacting more to pain than optimism. Even as we sit close to BTC all-time highs, this kind of steady asymmetry is unusual, something we usually only see during crypto bear markets.

12 Nov 2025

Opinions

At a glance


  • BTC still moves with equities. The correlation stays high, but BTC reacts more to Nasdaq losses than gains.
  • BTC’s performance skew has been structurally negative in 2025. BTC falls harder on equity down days than it rises on up days, a pattern last seen in the ‘22 bear markets.
  • This usually happens near bottoms, not tops. The current asymmetry signals exhaustion, not euphoria, which speaks to how well BTC price has been holding up despite this dynamic.

Performance Skew

The correlation between BTC and the Nasdaq-100 remains high (~0.8). Despite that tight linkage, BTC doesn’t seem to share in any of the equity market’s strength, it only moves in sync when it hurts.

This isn’t a breakdown of correlation, but a reflection of asymmetry, the uneven way BTC responds to risk. When equities rally, BTC’s reaction is muted. When they sell off, BTC tends to move more sharply in the same direction.

We measure this relationship through the performance skew between BTC and the Nasdaq-100 ie. how much harder BTC falls on Nasdaq down days than it rises on up days.

  • Positive skew = BTC leading risk. BTC outperforms, absorbing flows early in a risk-on environment.
  • Negative skew = BTC lagging risk. BTC underperforms, reacting to macro risk-off moves rather than driving them.

Right now, that skew is firmly negative, showing that BTC still trades as a high-beta expression of risk sentiment, but only when it cuts the wrong way.

Two key observations:

  • Asymmetry is compressing - the performance skew, ie. the asymmetry between BTC and Nasdaq-100 is compressing over time which is a reflection of BTCs maturing as a macro asset.
  • Asymmetry is elevated - the pain gap on a 365 day rolling basis (bottom panel) is the highest it’s been since the last bear market (late ‘22), exactly a year after BTC peaked.

The fact that the performance skew is structurally negative stands out, given BTC’s current price level. Negative asymmetry of this scale usually appeared when sentiment was washed out which has historically been a reflection of price activity.

Why is this happening now?

While there are a lot of other potential factors driving this. Two things stands out:

Mindshare shifting to equities

For much of 2025, the narrative capital that usually circulates within crypto, new token launches, infrastructure upgrades, fresh retail participation, has instead rotated toward equities. Mega-cap tech has become the magnet for both institutional and retail attention looking for high beta/growth. Much of the incremental dollar of risk appetite has flowed into the Nasdaq rather than digital assets (vs ‘20-21). 

This crowding of mindshare means BTC remains correlated when global risk sentiment turns, but doesn’t benefit proportionally when optimism returns. It reacts as a “high-beta tail” of macro risk rather than a standalone narrative, the downside beta remains, the upside narrative premium does not.

Liquidity profile

The second part is structural. As discussed last week, crypto’s liquidity profile today is different than in previous risk cycles. Stablecoin issuance has plateaued, ETF inflows have slowed, and market depth across exchanges hasn’t recovered to early-2024 levels. That fragility amplifies negative reactions when equities correct. The result: BTC’s downside participation remains mechanically higher than its upside, widening that performance skew

Putting it together

Looking at correlation alone doesn’t tell the full story, it shows direction, not intensity. BTC still trades as a macro asset, reacting to liquidity and positioning,

Historically, this kind of negative asymmetry doesn’t appear near tops but rather shows up near bottoms. When BTC falls harder on bad equity days than it rises on good ones, it usually signals exhaustion, not strength. While this surely is only part of the picture, the current BTC/Nasdaq performance skew suggests that BTC investors are somewhat exhausted and have been for a while. Given we’ve put down multiple ATHs and are <20% off the BTC top despite this dynamic speaks to how well BTC has been holding up.

Disclaimer: The information provided by Wintermute here solely for informational purposes and is intended only for professional counterparties, sophisticated, institutional investors and is not intended for retail use. The information does not constitute an offer or commitment, a solicitation of an offer, or commitment, or any advice or recommendation, to enter into or conclude any transactions, or to provide investment services in any state or country where such an offer or solicitation or provision would be illegal.

References to Wintermute include Wintermute Trading Ltd and its affiliates, including Wintermute Asia Pte Ltd. Spot trading is offered by Wintermute Trading (UK) and derivatives trading is offered by Wintermute Asia (Singapore).

These posts are not intended for users based in Singapore. Derivatives trading with Wintermute Asia is not suitable for retail persons in the United Kingdom. Trading and investing in digital assets and derivative transactions involve significant risks including price volatility and illiquidity and may not be suitable for all investors. The value of cryptocurrencies and any related financial instruments can fluctuate significantly, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should carefully consider your investment experience, financial situation, objectives, and risk tolerance before trading in cryptocurrencies or any other financial instrument. Wintermute is not liable whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss or damage arising from the reliance or use of the information provided on here.

Wintermute does not give any representations or warranties in relation to the accuracy, validity or complicity of the information of this material, including without limitation the factual information obtained from publicly available sources considered by Wintermute to be reliable; and does not accept any liability for any consequences of using the information contained in this material, and for the applicability of this material for the specific purposes and objectives of this material recipients. Any opinions or estimates expressed herein reflect a judgement made by the author(s) as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Neither this material nor any copy thereof may be taken, reproduced, or redistributed, directly or indirectly, without prior written permission of Wintermute.

Subscribe